📝 Add note on complementary testing approaches#6522
Conversation
|
Co-authored-by: dubzzz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dubzzz <[email protected]>
@fast-check/ava
fast-check
@fast-check/jest
@fast-check/packaged
@fast-check/poisoning
@fast-check/vitest
@fast-check/worker
commit: |
|
👋 A preview of the new documentation is available at: http://697f523598129d52d5744ca1--dubzzz-fast-check.netlify.app |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6522 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.85% 94.85%
=======================================
Files 207 207
Lines 5581 5581
Branches 1467 1468 +1
=======================================
Hits 5294 5294
Misses 274 274
Partials 13 13
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Clarifies that property-based testing should not replace example-based testing entirely.
Changes
Added a "Don't" guideline in the javascript-testing-expert skill file:
Positioned after the guideline about using property-based testing for edge case detection, reinforcing that both approaches serve distinct purposes in a comprehensive test suite.
Original prompt
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.