Skip to content

Conversation

@peterschmidt85
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #204

Copy link
Collaborator

@jvstme jvstme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@peterschmidt85, looks good overall, but Verda and Nebius catalog collection doesn't work with this PR

@peterschmidt85 peterschmidt85 requested a review from jvstme December 9, 2025 09:06
@peterschmidt85
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jvstme Fixed all. Please let me know if it's ok to release a new version of gpuhunt.

@jvstme
Copy link
Collaborator

jvstme commented Dec 9, 2025

if it's ok to release a new version of gpuhunt

It is, although I'm not sure why you'd want it. Verda is an offline provider, so dstack should be able to use its catalog without a new gpuhunt release

@peterschmidt85 peterschmidt85 merged commit eca273f into main Dec 9, 2025
17 checks passed
@peterschmidt85 peterschmidt85 deleted the 204-verda-rename-datacrunch-to-verda branch December 9, 2025 11:39
@peterschmidt85
Copy link
Contributor Author

if it's ok to release a new version of gpuhunt

It is, although I'm not sure why you'd want it. Verda is an offline provider, so dstack should be able to use its catalog without a new gpuhunt release

Yes, we need to make a new release because we use verda provider name from dstack in dstackai/dstack#3359

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Verda] Rename datacrunch to verda

3 participants