Skip to content

Conversation

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Aug 4, 2022

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/linker

  • Subscription: 4a865c13-5e52-41f5-3916-08d8e9750bf8
  • Build: 20220811.2
  • Date Produced: August 12, 2022 1:09:55 AM UTC
  • Commit: 81ffbb5af38a45ff60648999df8f35a79061ae43
  • Branch: refs/heads/main

…804.4

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22404.4
@ghost ghost added the Area-CodeFlow label Aug 4, 2022
@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

dotnet-maestro bot commented Aug 4, 2022

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/linker:

@marek-safar

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

…804.5

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22404.5
…805.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22405.1
…808.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22408.1
…808.2

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22408.2
…808.3

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22408.3
…809.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22409.1
…809.2

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22409.2
@dsplaisted
Copy link
Member

@agocke @LakshanF @vitek-karas Could someone take a look at these failures?

/root/helix/work/correlation/d/sdk/7.0.100-ci/Sdks/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks/build/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.targets(227,20): error MSB4109: Expected a property at position 1 in condition "$([MSBuild]::VersionLessThan('$(TargetFrameworkVersion)', '7.0')". Did you forget the closing parenthesis? [/root/helix/work/workitem/e/testExecutionDirectory/Publish_Hoste---B0B902C5/blazorwasm/blazorwasm.csproj]

@vitek-karas
Copy link
Member

@sbomer - this was introduced by dotnet/linker#2929 - seems like a simple missing parenthesis (please create an issue linker to figure out how to test the SDK integration in the linker repo - ideally in CI).

…809.6

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22409.6
…809.8

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22409.8
…809.9

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22409.9
…811.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22411.1
jtschuster added a commit to dotnet/linker that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2022
Analyzers look for a newer version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis than exists in the latest version of Visual Studio, and so they don't run in FullFramework tests in dotnet/sdk#26993. This reverts the version used in the analyzers.

PR #2969 will undo this change once Visual Studio ships with the correct version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.
…811.2

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22377.1 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22411.2
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot merged commit 6fd7efc into main Aug 12, 2022
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot deleted the darc-main-da747903-7521-48ee-9f96-7e6976d65466 branch August 12, 2022 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants