Skip to content

Conversation

@CoffeeFlux
Copy link
Contributor

Currently broken on Mono, see #43909

@CoffeeFlux CoffeeFlux added area-System.Runtime increase-code-coverage Tracking need to add more test and increase code coverage of a component labels Oct 27, 2020
CoffeeFlux added a commit to CoffeeFlux/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2020
This test uses the AssemblyResolve handler, but it's arguably a reflection test at the core, so I've put it here. Happy to move it elsewhere as appropriate. It currently passes on Mono due to dotnet#43910 but should not, so I've disabled it for now. Once that issue is resolved, I'll push a fix for this and re-enable the test.
@CoffeeFlux CoffeeFlux requested a review from jkotas October 27, 2020 19:42
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 27, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @vitek-karas, @agocke
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@CoffeeFlux
Copy link
Contributor Author

This one seems to finally be working as expected.

@CoffeeFlux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still need an approval on this. cc: @vitek-karas

Copy link
Member

@vitek-karas vitek-karas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@LakshanF can you please also take a look - you've added a similar test recently.

@CoffeeFlux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased and took out RemoteExecutor. Hopefully I didn't break something.

@vitek-karas
Copy link
Member

Looks to me as a good approach... will take another look once the tests passing.

@CoffeeFlux CoffeeFlux merged commit eb25a59 into dotnet:master Dec 7, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 6, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-AssemblyLoader-coreclr increase-code-coverage Tracking need to add more test and increase code coverage of a component

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants