Skip to content

Clarify wording for suppressing CI failure modes#124681

Merged
jkotas merged 3 commits intomainfrom
danmoseley-patch-1
Feb 21, 2026
Merged

Clarify wording for suppressing CI failure modes#124681
jkotas merged 3 commits intomainfrom
danmoseley-patch-1

Conversation

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

Updated wording for failure suppression suggestions in CI workflow documentation.

Updated wording for failure suppression suggestions in CI workflow documentation.
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates CI workflow documentation to clarify recommended wording when manually suppressing Build Analysis failures that can’t currently be matched to known issues.

Changes:

  • Clarifies that /ba-g takes an arbitrary justification string (and expands the parenthetical guidance).
  • Fixes/clarifies one of the suggested suppression reason examples for “all known issues filed”.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 21, 2026 00:30
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

@jkotas jkotas merged commit 0601ec7 into main Feb 21, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants