)

# Description

The `LibraryMode` test variant with `useWasmSdk: False, isPublish: True`
is expected to fail, but the test was asserting success for all
variants.

Updated test to set `ExpectSuccess: false` when publishing without WASM
SDK, verifying the operation exits with code 1 as expected.

```csharp
// Publishing without WASM SDK is expected to fail
bool expectSuccess = useWasmSdk || !isPublish;
if (isPublish)
    PublishProject(info, config, new PublishOptions(AssertAppBundle: useWasmSdk, ExpectSuccess: expectSuccess));
else
    BuildProject(info, config, new BuildOptions(AssertAppBundle: useWasmSdk, ExpectSuccess: expectSuccess));
```

# Customer Impact

No customer impact - test-only change.

# Regression

No. Test was incomplete, not validating the expected failure scenario.

# Testing

Test compiles successfully. The updated test will properly validate all
four variants:
- Build without SDK: succeeds
- Build with SDK: succeeds  
- Publish with SDK: succeeds
- Publish without SDK: **fails** (now correctly validated)

# Risk

Minimal - test-only change with no production code impact.

<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent [set things up for
you](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/new?title=✨+Set+up+Copilot+instructions&body=Configure%20instructions%20for%20this%20repository%20as%20documented%20in%20%5BBest%20practices%20for%20Copilot%20coding%20agent%20in%20your%20repository%5D%28https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips%29%2E%0A%0A%3COnboard%20this%20repo%3E&assignees=copilot)
— coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for
your repo.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: maraf <[email protected]>