Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Backport of #119059 to release/10.0

/cc @maraf

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

dotnet/aspnetcore#61987

If customers build Blazor based application in parallel (build whole solution or multi-target) there is possibility that a long running target run in parallel and try to write to the same files. This PR reduces the probability.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Testing

Existing tests cover the conversion to webcil format and integration into the whole build. Manual tests have been done regarding the parallel build execution.

Risk

Low.

@maraf maraf added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono os-browser Browser variant of arch-wasm labels Sep 2, 2025
@maraf maraf added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Sep 2, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. please get a code review. we can merge when ready

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 2, 2025
@lewing lewing merged commit 5add7e2 into release/10.0 Sep 2, 2025
168 of 175 checks passed
@lewing lewing deleted the backport/pr-119059-to-release/10.0 branch September 2, 2025 18:09
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono os-browser Browser variant of arch-wasm Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants