JIT: Add missing INS_FLAGS_HasPseudoName #117941
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
area-CodeGen-coreclr
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
Contributor
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
tannergooding
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
Member
|
Thanks. I think this must have gotten lost in one of the merge conflict resolutions. |
Open
3 tasks
Member
|
/ba-g unrelated timeouts |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#117097 added support for displaying pseudo-op names in JIT disasm based on a flag but didn't actually add the flag to the relevant instructions.
cc @tannergooding