src/coreclr/interpreter/compiler.cpp:3318

• New code paths for method‐start initClass and the subsequent runtime‐lookup branches (CORINFO_LOOKUP_THISOBJ, METHODPARAM, etc.) aren't covered by existing interpreter tests. Add tests in Interpreter.cs to exercise these branches and validate that the correct helper opcodes are emitted and executed.

    CorInfoInitClassResult initOnFunctionStart = m_compHnd->initClass(NULL, NULL, METHOD_BEING_COMPILED_CONTEXT());

src/tests/JIT/interpreter/Interpreter.cs:1996

• The error message references TriggerCctorClass even though this branch tests TriggerCctorMethod. Also it doesn't show the actual preciseInitCctorsRun value. Consider using Console.WriteLine("preciseInitCctorsRun should be 2, but is {0}", preciseInitCctorsRun); for clarity.

            Console.WriteLine("TriggerCctorClass should return 2, but did not");

src/tests/JIT/interpreter/Interpreter.cs:2003

• Same issue as above: this branch follows new MyPreciseInitClass<double>() but prints the wrong helper name and omits the actual counter value. Update to reference preciseInitCctorsRun with the expected versus actual value.

            Console.WriteLine("TriggerCctorClass should return 3, but did not");

src/tests/JIT/interpreter/Interpreter.cs:2016

• This message is in the branch testing TriggerCctorMethod<object>() but again calls out the wrong helper name and hides the counter. Use a consistent message like preciseInitCctorsRun should be 5, but is {0}.

            Console.WriteLine("TriggerCctorClass should return 5, but did not");

src/tests/JIT/interpreter/Interpreter.cs:2023

• Similarly, this branch tests the constructor on MyPreciseInitClass<Type>() but the message refers to TriggerCctorClass and omits the run count. Consider using the actual preciseInitCctorsRun in the output for easy debugging.

            Console.WriteLine("TriggerCctorClass should return 6, but did not");