Skip to content

[browser] Lazy loading should be extension agnostic #94132

New issue
New issue
Closed
#104793
Closed
[browser] Lazy loading should be extension agnostic#94132
#104793
Assignees
maraf
Labels
arch-wasmWebAssembly architecturearea-System.Runtime.InteropServices.JavaScriptin-prThere is an active PR which will close this issue when it is mergedos-browserBrowser variant of arch-wasm
Milestone
9.0.0
@maraf

Description

@maraf
maraf
opened on Oct 28, 2023
  • Both parts of lazy loading definition requires to use assembly file name (including extension)
  • With webcill an extension for assembly changes from .dll to .wasm
  • Current behavior requires to change lazy loading definition when switching between webcil and non-webcil
  • Ideally lazy loading definition should be without file extension
  • Making both extensions work is a blocker, because JS part of the runtime doesn't currently know if webcil was used or not. We probably could check for file with user passed extension in assets and if not found, check for .wasm

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

arch-wasmWebAssembly architecturearea-System.Runtime.InteropServices.JavaScriptin-prThere is an active PR which will close this issue when it is mergedos-browserBrowser variant of arch-wasm

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions