Skip to content

Conversation

@rolfbjarne
Copy link
Member

We've used to ignore the target platform version (the "17.0" part in "net8.0-ios17.0")
since our initial .NET relaese - customers could specify any valid OS version between
the minimum and maximum versions, and we'd completely ignore the value [1].

The purpose of the target platform version is to specify which bindings to choose:
"net8.0-ios17.0" would mean that the developer wants packages that have bindings
for iOS 17.0 (and earlier iOS versions, but not later iOS versions).

So saying "net8.0-ios11.0" would technically mean that the developer would want our
bindings for iOS 11.0 (and earlier iOS versions, but not later iOS versions). The
problem is that we don't ship any such thing... we shipped iOS 17.0 bindings in .NET
8, and that's it, you can't choose to build with something that does not have bindings
for iOS 17.0.

This will change with multi-targeting: we'll support some matrix of bindings. For
instance, we might want to support the OS version we shipped initial support in any
given .NET release + the latest OS version.

For example, we might want to support both of these:

  • net8.0-ios17.0
  • net8.0-ios17.2

This means that the target platform version (17.0/17.2) can't keep staying ignored.

There was an somewhat related issue with the SdkSupportedTargetPlatformVersion,
where we're now able to distinguish between old versions we no longer support and
new versions that limits the valid values for TargetPlatformVersion (see 74d83ca).
We've already taken advantage of this to properly annotate every version, even in
.NET 8 (in a future service update), because the dotnet/sdk change required to understand
the new annotations (and ignore old versions in the SdkSupportedTargetPlatformVersion
item group) won't be shipped until .NET 9, so this won't be a breaking change in
.NET 8.

However, we'd still like to give customers a heads up that their project files need
to change, so this PR adds a warning (that tells developers what to do), and then
in .NET 9 we'll make the warning an error instead. Side note: Android is also making
an invalid target platform version an error in .NET 9: dotnet/android#8569.

[1]: We'd ignore the value for executable projects. It did have an effect for library
projects that were packed into NuGets: the target platform version would be stored
in the NuGet.

We've used to ignore the target platform version (the "17.0" part in "net8.0-ios17.0")
since our initial .NET relaese - customers could specify any valid OS version between
the minimum and maximum versions, and we'd completely ignore the value [1].

The purpose of the target platform version is to specify which bindings to choose:
"net8.0-ios17.0" would mean that the developer wants packages that have bindings
for iOS 17.0 (and earlier iOS versions, but not later iOS versions).

So saying "net8.0-ios11.0" would technically mean that the developer would want our
bindings for iOS 11.0 (and earlier iOS versions, but not later iOS versions). The
problem is that we don't ship any such thing... we shipped iOS 17.0 bindings in .NET
8, and that's it, you can't choose to build with something that does *not* have bindings
for iOS 17.0.

This will change with multi-targeting: we'll support *some* matrix of bindings. For
instance, we might want to support the OS version we shipped initial support in any
given .NET release + the latest OS version.

For example, we might want to support both of these:

* net8.0-ios17.0
* net8.0-ios17.2

This means that the target platform version (17.0/17.2) can't keep staying ignored.

There was an somewhat related issue with the `SdkSupportedTargetPlatformVersion`,
where we're now able to distinguish between old versions we no longer support and
new versions that limits the valid values for TargetPlatformVersion (see 74d83ca).
We've already taken advantage of this to properly annotate every version, even in
.NET 8 (in a future service update), because the dotnet/sdk change required to understand
the new annotations (and ignore old versions in the `SdkSupportedTargetPlatformVersion`
item group) won't be shipped until .NET 9, so this won't be a breaking change in
.NET 8.

However, we'd still like to give customers a heads up that their project files need
to change, so this PR adds a warning (that tells developers what to do), and then
in .NET 9 we'll make the warning an error instead. Side note: Android is also making
an invalid target platform version an error in .NET 9: dotnet/android#8569.

[1]: We'd ignore the value for executable projects. It did have an effect for library
projects that were packed into NuGets: the target platform version would be stored
in the NuGet.
@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

💻 [CI Build] Tests on macOS M1 - Mac Ventura (13.0) passed 💻

All tests on macOS M1 - Mac Ventura (13.0) passed.

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: [PR build]

@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

💻 [CI Build] Tests on macOS M1 - Mac Big Sur (11.5) passed 💻

All tests on macOS M1 - Mac Big Sur (11.5) passed.

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: [PR build]

@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

📚 [PR Build] Artifacts 📚

Packages generated

View packages

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: [PR build]

@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

✅ API diff for current PR / commit

Legacy Xamarin (No breaking changes)
  • iOS (no change detected)
  • tvOS (no change detected)
  • watchOS (no change detected)
  • macOS (no change detected)
NET (empty diffs)
  • iOS: (empty diff detected)
  • tvOS: (empty diff detected)
  • MacCatalyst: (empty diff detected)
  • macOS: (empty diff detected)

✅ API diff vs stable

Legacy Xamarin (No breaking changes)
.NET (No breaking changes)
Legacy Xamarin (stable) vs .NET

ℹ️ Generator diff

Generator Diff: vsdrops (html) vsdrops (raw diff) gist (raw diff) - Please review changes)

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: 45f56fd1c19c8a9239a36a462ddde10fd49616b5 [PR build]

@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

💻 [CI Build] Windows Integration Tests passed 💻

All Windows Integration Tests passed.

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: 45f56fd1c19c8a9239a36a462ddde10fd49616b5 [PR build]

@vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2
Copy link
Collaborator

🚀 [CI Build] Test results 🚀

Test results

✅ All tests passed on VSTS: simulator tests.

🎉 All 166 tests passed 🎉

Tests counts

✅ cecil: All 1 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ dotnettests: All 1 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ fsharp: All 7 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ framework: All 8 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ generator: All 2 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ interdependent_binding_projects: All 7 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ install_source: All 1 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ introspection: All 8 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ linker: All 65 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ mac_binding_project: All 1 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ mmp: All 2 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ mononative: All 6 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ monotouch: All 41 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ msbuild: All 2 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ mtouch: All 1 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ xammac: All 3 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ xcframework: All 8 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download
✅ xtro: All 2 tests passed. Html Report (VSDrops) Download

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: 45f56fd1c19c8a9239a36a462ddde10fd49616b5 [PR build]

@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2024 17:36
@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne merged commit 546044f into dotnet:main Jan 25, 2024
@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne deleted the fix-invalid-target-platform-version-errors branch January 25, 2024 08:23
cyanfish added a commit to cyanfish/naps2 that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
cyanfish added a commit to cyanfish/naps2 that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
cyanfish added a commit to cyanfish/naps2 that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2024
cyanfish added a commit to cyanfish/naps2 that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants