-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Add complex form binding support to RDF #48790
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
8562327 to
9cd1006
Compare
9cd1006 to
723e2aa
Compare
|
Is RDG support coming later? |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return BindParameterFromFormItem(parameter, formAttribute.Name ?? parameter.Name, factoryContext); | ||
| var useSimpleBinding = parameter.ParameterType == typeof(string) || |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: comment on why this is the criteria used for simple vs complex binding?
Yep. The meta issue for this is available at #48759. "Converter source generation" outlines the requirement to codegen implementations of the converters for the serializer that are reflection-free so that we can use them in RDG. I've done some prototyping in this area but wanted to get this MVP out for RDF to make some movement in the space. |
|
Gotta start somewhere. I'm a little concerned that we'll have diverging support for these kinds of features in RDF and RDG which is why I picked it up. |
adityamandaleeka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left some minor nit comments but LGTM.
MackinnonBuck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.