Skip to content

Conversation

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@shirhatti shirhatti requested a review from Pilchie as a code owner July 29, 2021 23:56
Copy link
Contributor

@dougbu dougbu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll approve once your testing is done, eng/Versions.props is restored, and you've undone your TODO bit

Coming soon...
<Reference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.5.0.x64" PrivateAssets="All" />
<Reference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.AzureAppServices.SiteExtension.5.0.x86" PrivateAssets="All" />
-->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch ❕

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just realized that the SiteExtension build step is skipped for PRs. @dotnet/aspnet-build how would I verify this change?

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jul 30, 2021

@dotnet/aspnet-build how would I verify this change?

Either

  1. Add another temporary change to remove the condition: in .azure/pipelines/ci.yml for the 'Build SiteExtension' job
  2. Push your branch to the dotnet-aspnetcore AzDO (mirror) repo and manually start a build there; don't create an internal PR

@shirhatti shirhatti requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2021 00:26
Copy link
Contributor

@dougbu dougbu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great if I squint and ignore the TODO items that you'll remove. Thanks again

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Jul 30, 2021

@JunTaoLuo are there current issues w/ Components.E2ETests and the SignalR tests❔ I can't see how @shirhatti's changes would cause the failures in the current build

@BrennanConroy
Copy link
Member

SignalR tests

Hmm, just added that test, I'll try to see if it's flaky and fix it

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Verified that the right package got built
image

@shirhatti shirhatti enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2021 07:17
@BrennanConroy
Copy link
Member

Am I confusing issues? In the email you said we didn't have the 6.0 folder with a picture, but this adds the 5.0 folder which was in the picture.

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Am I confusing issues? In the email you said we didn't have the 6.0 folder with a picture, but this adds the 5.0 folder which was in the picture.

I misspoke in the email. I was looking at the 5.0 package (since we don't publish SiteExtension packages for preview releases). Turns out I found another issue in the process 😅

@BrennanConroy
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@shirhatti shirhatti merged commit 11dd487 into main Jul 30, 2021
@shirhatti shirhatti deleted the shirhatti/logging-site-extension branch July 30, 2021 19:50
@ghost ghost added this to the 6.0-rc1 milestone Jul 30, 2021
@amcasey amcasey added area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions and removed area-runtime labels Aug 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants