Skip to content

Conversation

@alexislefebvre
Copy link
Contributor

@alexislefebvre alexislefebvre commented Nov 29, 2025

No description provided.

are missing they will be computed considering the field's name and the current
:doc:`naming strategy <namingstrategy>`.

The ``#[InverseJoinColumn]`` is the same as ``#[JoinColumn]`` and is used in the context
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wasn’t sure if I should remove only the last sentence or the whole paragraph.

If it’s not necessary, then there’s no need to mention it.

@derrabus
Copy link
Member

Let's fix that on 3.5.x instead?

@alexislefebvre alexislefebvre force-pushed the 4.0.x-remove-InverseJoinColumn-for-PHP-8.0 branch from d9cf956 to f4f94ee Compare November 29, 2025 23:46
@alexislefebvre alexislefebvre changed the base branch from 4.0.x to 3.5.x November 29, 2025 23:46
@derrabus derrabus added this to the 3.5.9 milestone Nov 29, 2025
@derrabus derrabus merged commit 7c347b8 into doctrine:3.5.x Nov 29, 2025
1 check passed
@alexislefebvre alexislefebvre deleted the 4.0.x-remove-InverseJoinColumn-for-PHP-8.0 branch November 30, 2025 00:04
@greg0ire greg0ire added this to the 3.6.0 milestone Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants