Refactor multiarch support to go all the way to correct Architectures lines in "generate-stackbrew-library.sh"#121
Merged
yosifkit merged 1 commit intodocker-library:masterfrom Jun 8, 2017
Conversation
… lines in "generate-stackbrew-library.sh"
Member
Author
|
This will have better output following docker-library/official-images#3041: $ ./generate-stackbrew-library.sh
# this file is generated via https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/efbcd4f8e42e510ef561a7ce518633f0eba33992/generate-stackbrew-library.sh
Maintainers: Tianon Gravi <[email protected]> (@tianon),
Joseph Ferguson <[email protected]> (@yosifkit)
GitRepo: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk.git
Tags: 6b38-jdk, 6b38, 6-jdk, 6
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, i386
GitCommit: bd3c2a9867c9dc6a9a8425a8df5c54edf0cbf2cc
Directory: 6-jdk
Tags: 6b38-jre, 6-jre
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, i386
GitCommit: bd3c2a9867c9dc6a9a8425a8df5c54edf0cbf2cc
Directory: 6-jre
Tags: 7u131-jdk, 7u131, 7-jdk, 7
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: 93316d3b14379d29fe0cd363bd6839eb8dd8cc7b
Directory: 7-jdk
Tags: 7u131-jdk-alpine, 7u131-alpine, 7-jdk-alpine, 7-alpine
Architectures: amd64
GitCommit: 43e145f3fc5fd98a141f0c1c6fe90b9ea93977da
Directory: 7-jdk/alpine
Tags: 7u131-jre, 7-jre
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: 93316d3b14379d29fe0cd363bd6839eb8dd8cc7b
Directory: 7-jre
Tags: 7u131-jre-alpine, 7-jre-alpine
Architectures: amd64
GitCommit: 43e145f3fc5fd98a141f0c1c6fe90b9ea93977da
Directory: 7-jre/alpine
Tags: 8u131-jdk, 8u131, 8-jdk, 8, jdk, latest
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: 415b0cc42d91ef5d70597d8a24d942967728242b
Directory: 8-jdk
Tags: 8u131-jdk-alpine, 8u131-alpine, 8-jdk-alpine, 8-alpine, jdk-alpine, alpine
Architectures: amd64
GitCommit: 43e145f3fc5fd98a141f0c1c6fe90b9ea93977da
Directory: 8-jdk/alpine
Tags: 8u131-jdk-windowsservercore, 8u131-windowsservercore, 8-jdk-windowsservercore, 8-windowsservercore, jdk-windowsservercore, windowsservercore
Architectures: windows-amd64
GitCommit: 9745c87a15896ec558429a826e23926e721e4846
Directory: 8-jdk/windows/windowsservercore
Constraints: windowsservercore
Tags: 8u131-jdk-nanoserver, 8u131-nanoserver, 8-jdk-nanoserver, 8-nanoserver, jdk-nanoserver, nanoserver
Architectures: windows-amd64
GitCommit: 9745c87a15896ec558429a826e23926e721e4846
Directory: 8-jdk/windows/nanoserver
Constraints: nanoserver
Tags: 8u131-jre, 8-jre, jre
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: 415b0cc42d91ef5d70597d8a24d942967728242b
Directory: 8-jre
Tags: 8u131-jre-alpine, 8-jre-alpine, jre-alpine
Architectures: amd64
GitCommit: 43e145f3fc5fd98a141f0c1c6fe90b9ea93977da
Directory: 8-jre/alpine
Tags: 9-b170-jdk, 9-b170, 9-jdk, 9
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: c34391ea981c804c097981bad8403ec4bd934285
Directory: 9-jdk
Tags: 9-b170-jre, 9-jre
Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le, s390x
GitCommit: c34391ea981c804c097981bad8403ec4bd934285
Directory: 9-jre |
tianon
added a commit
to infosiftr/stackbrew
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2017
- `gcc`: multiarch (docker-library/gcc#36) - `mongo`: explicit `Architectures` - `openjdk`: multiarch (docker-library/openjdk#121) - `pypy`: update `pip` installation to match recent Python changes (docker-library/pypy#15) - `redis`: smaller Debian-based images (redis/docker-library-redis#94), multiarch (redis/docker-library-redis#95) - `wordpress`: 4.8
Contributor
|
@tianon Do you have any guidance on how to support this in derived images? I'd like to make any changes necessary to the |
Member
Author
|
@md5 yeah, if Jetty supports other arches (which would make sense, given its Java base 😄), adding an appropriate (I'd just ask that you test on at least |
This was referenced Jun 10, 2017
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Jun 15, 2017
This was referenced Jun 16, 2017
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Aug 24, 2017
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See also docker-library/buildpack-deps#59, docker-library/golang#163, docker-library/docker#63, docker-library/gcc#36, jessfraz/irssi#15, redis/docker-library-redis#95.