Plot thickens: the binary builds fine on Jenkins. Sigh. Can anyone else successfully run script/build-linux locally on this branch?

nope, unfortunately the build fails like yours.

Have upgraded to requests==2.6.1, but I'm still getting the same error locally.

@funkyfuture Thanks for checking. Could you try once more with the current commit?

[aanm@localhost compose]$ sudo script/build-linux
...
Step 14 : ENTRYPOINT /usr/local/bin/docker-compose
 ---> Running in ebbc535559d6
 ---> 9826101aa1ad
Removing intermediate container ebbc535559d6
Successfully built 9826101aa1ad
++ pwd
+ docker run --rm --user=user --volume=/home/aanm/git-repos/go/src/github.com/noironetworks/compose:/code --entrypoint=script/build-linux-inner docker-compose
++ pwd
+ mkdir -p /code/dist
++ pwd
+ chmod 777 /code/dist
chmod: changing permissions of `/code/dist': Operation not permitted

Maybe it's my fault but the /code/dist was not created inside the compose directory.

@aanand sorry, same here. tests are passing though.

fun fact: i was just noting down this pr as a predicate for another project.

@aanm this doesn't happen on my box.

I wonder if it would be easier to start looking at alternatives to pyinstaller. We've hit a few problems with it (py3 support, six version conflict, and now requests version conflict). In #1051 (comment) I mentioned http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/shipping/freezing/ which seems to have a bunch of options for doing this.

@dnephin the comparison table looks like cx_freeze is the only one beside PyInstaller that supports Linux, OS X, Windows and Python 3.

and propably this isn't suitable as it can't link into one executable binary for Windows.

I can reproduce the problem outside Compose by trying to build a binary with just import docker in it, and installing docker-py from a Git URL (even if it's the commit for a stable, released version). Using docker-py==1.1.0 fixes it (but obviously the code doesn't work / tests don't pass at that point, because there's no labels support in docker-py 1.1.0).

The easiest way to fix this right now - so that this and #1356 can be merged with confidence - might be to just get a docker-py release out with labels support, so we don't have to rely on Git URLs.

@shin-: any thoughts on that?

what about bundling the docker-py-code for the time being?

re-reads #375 for old times' sake

docker-py 1.2.0 is in the works, there's only a few things left which I've listed here: https://github.com/docker/docker-py/milestones/1.2.0

Sorry, I realize it's long overdue!

Thanks! This is ready to go now.

ping @bfirsh @dnephin

LGTM!

Awesome! docker-archive/classicswarm#673

@thaJeztah Nice.