use a simpler prompt implementation when we lack a terminal#10144
Merged
use a simpler prompt implementation when we lack a terminal#10144
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nicolas De Loof <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportBase: 73.89% // Head: 73.89% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v2 #10144 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.89% 73.89%
=======================================
Files 2 2
Lines 272 272
=======================================
Hits 201 201
Misses 60 60
Partials 11 11 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
nicksieger
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
When stdin is not a terminal, use a simpler Prompt implementation to collect and parse user confirmation
make the survey implementation to rely on dockercli.In() on Out() streams - unfortunately, not using
Fd()butFD()as func name, so need an adapterRelated issue
closes #9739
(not mandatory) A picture of a cute animal, if possible in relation to what you did
