validate and update vendor targets#3634
Conversation
Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3634 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.33% 56.58% +0.24%
==========================================
Files 101 103 +2
Lines 7313 7520 +207
==========================================
+ Hits 4120 4255 +135
- Misses 2536 2596 +60
- Partials 657 669 +12
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ jobs: | |||
| run: | | |||
| DCO_VERBOSITY=-q script/validate/dco | |||
| GO111MODULE=on script/setup/install-dev-tools | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm wondering, do we still need GO111MODULE? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes not necessary. In a follow-up we should remove the ci workflow and take a look at the DCO check but DCO bot might be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think the DCO bot should take care of that...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 for remove GO111MODULE
| fail-fast: false | ||
| matrix: | ||
| target: | ||
| - validate-vendor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this somehow automagically trigger make validate-vendor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes exactly. The idea in the follow-up is to add other validators to this matrix like lint, authors, etc... See https://github.com/docker/buildx/blob/a6a1a362ad951af488fc41388f41a2d52b25f791/.github/workflows/validate.yml#L23-L25
Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <[email protected]>
follow-up #3315
discussed with @milosgajdos about cleaning up our workflows that are a bit redundant (like the
ci.ymlone).this pr adds targets to update and validate vendor:
like our build workflow, everything is sandboxed.
another target has been added to check for outdated dependencies: