Skip to content

Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go#2027

Merged
dmcgowan merged 1 commit intodistribution:masterfrom
ahmetb:pr-azure-memleak2
Nov 4, 2016
Merged

Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go#2027
dmcgowan merged 1 commit intodistribution:masterfrom
ahmetb:pr-azure-memleak2

Conversation

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmetb ahmetb commented Oct 28, 2016

Updating to a recent version of Azure Storage SDK to be
able to patch some memory leaks through configurable HTTP client
change added to the registry recently.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 28, 2016

Current coverage is 50.89% (diff: 0.00%)

Merging #2027 into master will decrease coverage by 10.60%

@@             master      #2027   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           126        125      -1   
  Lines         11263      11137    -126   
  Methods           0          0           
  Messages          0          0           
  Branches          0          0           
==========================================
- Hits           6927       5668   -1259   
- Misses         3449       4726   +1277   
+ Partials        887        743    -144   

Powered by Codecov. Last update fbe6e8d...2ab2528

"ImportPath": "github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/storage",
"Comment": "v1.2-334-g95361a2",
"Rev": "95361a2573b1fa92a00c5fc2707a80308483c6f9"
"Comment": "v6.0.0-beta",
Copy link

@RichardScothern RichardScothern Oct 31, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like using a package marked as beta in a production system.

Is there something between v1.2 and v6 that is more stable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RichardScothern It's all stable, don't mind the name. 😸 I'm not sure why we still keep adding -beta.

@ahmetb ahmetb mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2016
@RichardScothern
Copy link

LGTM

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Nov 1, 2016

More love for this PR?

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Nov 3, 2016

Actually, let's not merge it yet, I discovered some bugs in our SDK that I need to first patch in the azure-sdk-for-go repo.

Updating to a recent version of Azure Storage SDK to be
able to patch some memory leaks through configurable HTTP client
changes which were made possible by recent patches to it.

Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <[email protected]>
@RichardScothern RichardScothern changed the title Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go [do not merge] Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go Nov 3, 2016
@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Nov 3, 2016

@RichardScothern ready to go now!

I updated the vendored bits to include this commit which was giving a nil dereference error on some improper resp.Body.Close() which was causing some registry requests to panic.

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Collaborator

dmcgowan commented Nov 3, 2016

LGTM, update name now?

@ahmetb ahmetb changed the title [do not merge] Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go Update vendored azure-sdk-for-go Nov 3, 2016
@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Nov 3, 2016

@dmcgowan updated.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Nov 4, 2016

2 LGTMs, so merge maybe? 😸

@dmcgowan dmcgowan merged commit a2611c7 into distribution:master Nov 4, 2016
sergeyfd pushed a commit to sergeyfd/distribution that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2016
Ref: distribution#2027

Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <[email protected]>
dalsh pushed a commit to dalsh/distribution that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2017
Ref: distribution#2027

Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants