Skip to content

Conversation

@imnaiyar
Copy link
Contributor

@imnaiyar imnaiyar commented Dec 8, 2024

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
with_response was missing implementations in some methods and wrong return types due to #10512.

Status and versioning classification:

  • Code changes have been tested against the Discord API, or there are no code changes
  • I know how to update typings and have done so, or typings don't need updating

@imnaiyar imnaiyar requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2024 21:05
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
discord-js ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 9, 2024 8:36am
discord-js-guide ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 9, 2024 8:36am

@Jiralite Jiralite changed the title fix(types): wrong return type with with_response in core fix(interactions): wrong return type with with_response in core Dec 8, 2024
@Jiralite Jiralite added this to the core 3.0.0 milestone Dec 8, 2024
Jiralite
Jiralite previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2024
@imnaiyar imnaiyar changed the title fix(interactions): wrong return type with with_response in core fix(interactions): wrong return type and missing implementation of with_response in core Dec 8, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 1cfc835 into discordjs:main Dec 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.09%. Comparing base (b3d4259) to head (cb6530e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10644      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.10%   37.09%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         239      239              
  Lines       15212    15208       -4     
  Branches     1373     1371       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         5645     5641       -4     
  Misses       9556     9556              
  Partials       11       11              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@imnaiyar imnaiyar deleted the fix/type branch December 9, 2024 12:12
imnaiyar added a commit to imnaiyar/discord.js that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
…th_response in core (discordjs#10644)

* fix(types): wrong return type with with_response

* fix: missing implementation of with_response

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Jiralite pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
…th_response in core (#10644)

* fix(types): wrong return type with with_response

* fix: missing implementation of with_response

---------

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants