Load relational data from api on button-links#17959
Merged
rijkvanzanten merged 5 commits intomainfrom Apr 12, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Nitwel
requested review from
azrikahar,
freekrai and
licitdev
and removed request for
a team
freekrai
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2023
rijkvanzanten
requested changes
Apr 11, 2023
rijkvanzanten
approved these changes
Apr 12, 2023
hanneskuettner
pushed a commit
to hanneskuettner/directus
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
* load relational data from api on button-links * make const shared * lint --------- Co-authored-by: Rijk van Zanten <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Azri Kahar <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before, you where able to select relational fields of an item to insert but we didn't fetch that data from the api and only relied on the data that was already existing. Could be a very old side effect of the relational rework.
Fixes #17837, fixes ENG-824