Skip to content

Conversation

@Reamer
Copy link
Member

@Reamer Reamer commented Jun 22, 2025

Why?

I was contacted by SonarSource due to various bug reports in the forum, as well as in the support. It turned out that due to the HTML hack of the dependency-check plugin Sonarqube reacted very slowly.
This plugin uploaded the complete HTML report as a metric. This endpoint was never intended for this.
Unfortunately, the SonarQube server does not offer any other endpoint for uploading larger files. I have therefore decided to remove the feature so that the plugin remains usable.
Unfortunately, I don't have enough frontend knowledge to render a page from the existing issues and maybe recreate the behavior of the suppress button in the HTML report. Contributions are welcome.

Fix #1045

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@Reamer Reamer merged commit e0406b7 into master Jun 22, 2025
5 checks passed
@Reamer Reamer deleted the removehtml branch June 22, 2025 12:15
@YozhEzhi
Copy link

@Reamer Hi!

Please, tell about how this will affect current view of dependency-check page?
What we should see when opening html report in Sonar UI?

@Reamer
Copy link
Member Author

Reamer commented Jun 26, 2025

@Reamer Hi!

Please, tell about how this will affect current view of dependency-check page? What we should see when opening html report in Sonar UI?

Nothing, as the page has been removed.

@arosenblum
Copy link

arosenblum commented Jul 28, 2025

Hi, does anyone know when this will be released? We've stopped generation of the HTML reports in most of our pipelines, but some old ones are still generating/uploading and we would prefer to 'block' that from being uploaded into SQ.

@Reamer

@Reamer
Copy link
Member Author

Reamer commented Jul 29, 2025

Hi @arosenblum
I'm working on the README.md. What do you think of the following change?
#1078

@arosenblum
Copy link

arosenblum commented Aug 4, 2025

Hi @arosenblum I'm working on the README.md. What do you think of the following change? #1078

@Reamer - Looks good! But I notice that the title specifically says "2025.2 or higher" but the compatibility table says "2025.x and up" I think the title should change to 2025.x (and up) to match the table.

@falco-bethke
Copy link

how comes in this PR the SQ Cloud results are annotated but not accessible?
@Reamer
wouldn't it make sense to set the SQ project public readable like this example:
https://sonarcloud.io/project/pull_requests_list?id=microsoft_vscode-python

@Reamer
Copy link
Member Author

Reamer commented Sep 3, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Long UI loading times since upgrade to 2025.1

5 participants