-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
RAM #524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #524 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.01% 83.03% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 196 198 +2
Lines 18451 19017 +566
Branches 2470 2553 +83
==========================================
+ Hits 15318 15791 +473
- Misses 2283 2354 +71
- Partials 850 872 +22 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
do you think you can make a demo file too? maybe with some finetuning at the end? |
|
still todo:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
many thanks for this!
On top of the suggested changes to the demo to Poisson, I think I would change the way the model is added to the User Guide. I would suggest to add it in the list of Denoisers
| - Yes |
(since it can be used as a denoiser), and also as a 'Specific Networks'
| * - Model |
although the name specific is somewhat contradictory, and maybe we should call them differently 'Other Models'? Maybe a good option is to keep two subsections, one with Problem-Specific (for eg PanNet) and General Models for DPIR and RAM?
Andrewwango
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CHANGELOG please.
Thanks for integrating RAM into deepinv, here are some comments!
|
Thanks @Andrewwango! I'm halfway through your comments - I'll ping you when done. TODO: compare with MultiScalePhysics |
Andrewwango
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Matthieu! hopefully nearing the end, some comments and questions:
tachella
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some more changes, mostly on docs and efficiency
Andrewwango
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding a Request changes to fix performance tests discussed offline.
Andrewwango
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Checks to be done before submitting your PR
python3 -m pytest tests/runs successfully.black .runs successfully.make htmlruns successfully (in thedocs/directory).