You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for doing that outreach. Maybe big-bang is a (temporary) option too?
Or ReadTheDocs also supports a subdomain of a custom domain; e.g. docs.bigbang.data-activism.net. @nllz , do you think datactive would be supportive of that? It might be nice to move the project webpage to bigbang.data-activism.net instead of a Github subdomain as well.
That would definitely be possible, but datactive as a project has ended. While we can still is datactive, nor IN-SIGHT.it, which is the follow-up project, we can also choose to register our own domain?
I have no strong feelings either way and am happy to make it happen.
For RTD, I think I'd like to go with bigbang-py.
Opening the possibility of alternative implementations in other languages, like Julia.
I think we should set up a separate organization that corresponds to whatever consortium of internet researchers we would like to recognized as. This organization would ultimately become the foundation that manages the data licensing.
Activity
npdoty commentedon Mar 23, 2021
I think this is a duplicate of #340.
sbenthall commentedon Sep 17, 2021
A hangup: another project is currently using:
https://bigbang.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I've asked that project if they would be willing to give up the URL, since they don't seem to be using it:
lennonalvesdias/BigBang#5
If that doesn't work we may need to come up with a different URL, like
bigbang-project.npdoty commentedon Sep 22, 2021
Thanks for doing that outreach. Maybe
big-bangis a (temporary) option too?Or ReadTheDocs also supports a subdomain of a custom domain; e.g.
docs.bigbang.data-activism.net. @nllz , do you think datactive would be supportive of that? It might be nice to move the project webpage tobigbang.data-activism.netinstead of a Github subdomain as well.nllz commentedon Sep 22, 2021
That would definitely be possible, but datactive as a project has ended. While we can still is datactive, nor IN-SIGHT.it, which is the follow-up project, we can also choose to register our own domain?
I have no strong feelings either way and am happy to make it happen.
sbenthall commentedon Sep 24, 2021
There are a number of intersecting questions about the project's identity involved here.
If datactive is no longer an active project, then we should consider moving the bigbang repository to a different GitHub organization.
nllz commentedon Sep 24, 2021
I think the project is adult enought to be its own organization I'd say.
But as said, happy to make it part of https://github.com/in-sight-it/ (the project in which @pgroth and I work). That project will run for tour more years.
sbenthall commentedon Sep 28, 2021
For RTD, I think I'd like to go with
bigbang-py.Opening the possibility of alternative implementations in other languages, like Julia.
I think we should set up a separate organization that corresponds to whatever consortium of internet researchers we would like to recognized as. This organization would ultimately become the foundation that manages the data licensing.
in-sigh-it could maintain a fork?
sbenthall commentedon Oct 15, 2021
This issue is done with PR #491