Skip to content

autodocs #412

Closed
Closed

Description

@sbenthall

We've made it this far without automated documentation.
But we should make a documentation directory and publish the docs to readthedocs.

https://readthedocs.org/

Activity

  1. added this to the 0.2.1 milestone on Mar 1, 2021
  2. self-assigned this
    on Mar 1, 2021
  3. npdoty commented on Mar 23, 2021

    @npdoty
    Collaborator

    I think this is a duplicate of #340.

  4. modified the milestones: 0.2.1, 1.0 on Mar 26, 2021
  5. sbenthall commented on Sep 17, 2021

    @sbenthall
    CollaboratorAuthor

    A hangup: another project is currently using:
    https://bigbang.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    I've asked that project if they would be willing to give up the URL, since they don't seem to be using it:
    lennonalvesdias/BigBang#5

    If that doesn't work we may need to come up with a different URL, like bigbang-project.

  6. npdoty commented on Sep 22, 2021

    @npdoty
    Collaborator

    Thanks for doing that outreach. Maybe big-bang is a (temporary) option too?

    Or ReadTheDocs also supports a subdomain of a custom domain; e.g. docs.bigbang.data-activism.net. @nllz , do you think datactive would be supportive of that? It might be nice to move the project webpage to bigbang.data-activism.net instead of a Github subdomain as well.

  7. nllz commented on Sep 22, 2021

    @nllz
    Contributor

    That would definitely be possible, but datactive as a project has ended. While we can still is datactive, nor IN-SIGHT.it, which is the follow-up project, we can also choose to register our own domain?

    I have no strong feelings either way and am happy to make it happen.

  8. sbenthall commented on Sep 24, 2021

    @sbenthall
    CollaboratorAuthor

    There are a number of intersecting questions about the project's identity involved here.

    If datactive is no longer an active project, then we should consider moving the bigbang repository to a different GitHub organization.

  9. nllz commented on Sep 24, 2021

    @nllz
    Contributor

    I think the project is adult enought to be its own organization I'd say.

    But as said, happy to make it part of https://github.com/in-sight-it/ (the project in which @pgroth and I work). That project will run for tour more years.

  10. sbenthall commented on Sep 28, 2021

    @sbenthall
    CollaboratorAuthor

    For RTD, I think I'd like to go with bigbang-py.
    Opening the possibility of alternative implementations in other languages, like Julia.

    I think we should set up a separate organization that corresponds to whatever consortium of internet researchers we would like to recognized as. This organization would ultimately become the foundation that manages the data licensing.

    in-sigh-it could maintain a fork?

  11. sbenthall commented on Oct 15, 2021

    @sbenthall
    CollaboratorAuthor

    This issue is done with PR #491

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions