Skip to content

Conversation

@kwvg
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg commented Mar 18, 2024

Additional Information

As found in #5929 (comment), validation.h is not needed for specialtxman.cpp and removing the header uncovers other circular dependencies that were obscured by the shortest circular path (see #5929 (comment)).

Breaking Changes

None.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas (note: N/A)
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (note: N/A)
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

As found in a review comment in dashpay#5908[1], validation.h is not needed for
specialtxman.cpp and removing the header uncovers other circular
dependencies that were obscured by the shortest circular path[2].

[1] - dashpay#5929 (comment)
[2] - dashpay#5929 (comment)
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM dfddfd0

let's wait CI

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@kwvg kwvg requested a review from PastaPastaPasta March 18, 2024 19:03
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK dfddfd0

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 4c06535 into dashpay:develop Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants