Skip to content

Conversation

@vijaydasmp
Copy link

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp commented Jul 23, 2023

No description provided.

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: backport: Merge bitcoin#19847,20468 Jul 23, 2023
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp force-pushed the bp22_5 branch 2 times, most recently from efa30bb to 2fc2cd2 Compare July 24, 2023 07:38
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#19847,20468 backport: Merge bitcoin#20468,20568,20651,20606 Jul 24, 2023
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp force-pushed the bp22_5 branch 3 times, most recently from efe2622 to 441d136 Compare July 25, 2023 05:15
@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

Hello @UdjinM6 , please review

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2023 09:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NACK: bitcoin#20830 should be done only after bitcoin#18267 backported.
We don't have "signet" now.

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#20468,20568,20651,20606 backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606, 20651, 20830 Jul 26, 2023
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606, 20651, 20830 backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606, 18267, 20830 Jul 26, 2023
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606, 18267, 20830 backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606 Jul 26, 2023
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp requested a review from knst July 26, 2023 17:03
@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

NACK: bitcoin#20830 should be done only after bitcoin#18267 backported. We don't have "signet" now.

dropped bitcoin#20830 for now

@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

Hello @knst please review

@knst
Copy link
Collaborator

knst commented Jul 27, 2023

why 20568 is partial? I don't see any missing changes...

otherwise LGTM

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, (partial) 20568, 20606 backport: Merge bitcoin#20468, 20568, 20606 Jul 29, 2023
@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

why 20568 is partial? I don't see any missing changes...

otherwise LGTM

agree, removed partial

Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 20 milestone Jul 30, 2023
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 requested a review from PastaPastaPasta July 30, 2023 12:59
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for merging via merge commit

laanwj added 3 commits August 1, 2023 12:21
…es built from a dirty branch

6690adb Warn when binaries are built from a dirty branch. (Tyler Chambers)

Pull request description:

  - Adjusted `--version` flag behavior in bitcoind and bitcoin-wallet to have the same behavior.
  - Added `--version` flag to bitcoin-tx to match.
  - Added functionality in gen-manpages.sh to error when attempting to generate man pages for binaries built from a dirty branch.

  mitigates problem with  issue bitcoin#20412

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Tested ACK 6690adb

Tree-SHA512: b5ca509f1a57f66808c2bebc4b710ca00c6fec7b5ebd7eef58018e28e716f5f2358e36551b8a4df571bf3204baed565a297aeefb93990e7a99add502b97ee1b8
fa8abdc rpc: Use FeeModes doc helper in estimatesmartfee (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Not sure why this doesn't use the doc helper, probably an oversight?

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa8abdc

Tree-SHA512: 1f2dc8356e3476ddcf9cafafa7f9865ad95bed1e3067c0edab8e3c483e374bdbdbecc066167554b4a1b479e28f6a52c4ae6a75a70c67ee4e1ff4f3ba36b04001
fa40168 Remove unused bits from service flags enum (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Remove service bits that haven't been observed on the active network for years and won't ever be observed on the network with this meaning. Keeping this dead assignment in our source code forever doesn't add any value.

  I somehow forgot to do this in commit fa0d0ff.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa40168
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK fa40168
  fanquake:
    ACK fa40168

Tree-SHA512: 376e5ac05940493cf2209fea60515c843e978c4b476f2524f6bf7a37a646d237c3ddcf6c0fa23641f9ba550f625609703d9b51b4be631a7f2a90e1092b557232
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit fa40fc6 into dashpay:develop Aug 1, 2023
thephez added a commit to thephez/docs-core that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
thephez added a commit to dashpay/docs-core that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
* docs: deprecate MSG_LEGACY_TXLOCK_REQUEST

Aligns with dashpay/dash#5483

* chore: update link to prev version of docs

* docs: update mnlistdiff nversion location

Relates to dashpay/dash#5450

* docs(p2p): update mnlistdiff

Relates to dashpay/dash#5377

* docs: update cbtx for v3

Relates to dashpay/dash#5262

* docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation

Relates to dashpay/dash#5469 and dashpay/dash#5505

* docs: note removal of NODE_GETUTXO

Relates to dashpay/dash#5500

* chore: revert "docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation"

This reverts commit 8e4bf6c since there
may still be additional changes to the implementation (it's not merged)
thephez added a commit to thephez/docs-core that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
* docs: deprecate MSG_LEGACY_TXLOCK_REQUEST

Aligns with dashpay/dash#5483

* chore: update link to prev version of docs

* docs: update mnlistdiff nversion location

Relates to dashpay/dash#5450

* docs(p2p): update mnlistdiff

Relates to dashpay/dash#5377

* docs: update cbtx for v3

Relates to dashpay/dash#5262

* docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation

Relates to dashpay/dash#5469 and dashpay/dash#5505

* docs: note removal of NODE_GETUTXO

Relates to dashpay/dash#5500

* chore: revert "docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation"

This reverts commit 8e4bf6c since there
may still be additional changes to the implementation (it's not merged)
thephez added a commit to dashpay/docs-core that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2023
* docs: deprecate MSG_LEGACY_TXLOCK_REQUEST

Aligns with dashpay/dash#5483

* chore: update link to prev version of docs

* docs: update mnlistdiff nversion location

Relates to dashpay/dash#5450

* docs(p2p): update mnlistdiff

Relates to dashpay/dash#5377

* docs: update cbtx for v3

Relates to dashpay/dash#5262

* docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation

Relates to dashpay/dash#5469 and dashpay/dash#5505

* docs: note removal of NODE_GETUTXO

Relates to dashpay/dash#5500

* chore: revert "docs: update mnhf with details of final implementation"

This reverts commit 8e4bf6c since there
may still be additional changes to the implementation (it's not merged)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants