Skip to content

Conversation

@ogabrielides
Copy link

@ogabrielides ogabrielides commented Mar 1, 2023

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

minSize of llmq_test_dip0024 is set to 4. Enforcing to use rotation with at least 4 nodes (avoid unhealthy member calculations)

After the DIP24 fork, instant locks will still be served by llmq_test_instantsend, since no llmq_test_dip0024 will be formed with less than 4 nodes.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for squash merge, tests pass locally, linter good.

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit bc7e941 into dashpay:develop Mar 1, 2023
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes
After the DIP24 fork, instant locks will still be served by
`llmq_test_instantsend`, since no `llmq_test_dip0024` will be formed
with less than 4 nodes.

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
@ogabrielides ogabrielides deleted the llmq_test_dip24_minsize_adjustement branch March 1, 2023 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants