-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
merge bitcoin#15928...#16984: backports #4570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
utACK for merging via merge commit (assuming CI is happy)
|
build fails |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
d56d62e to
01c5201
Compare
01c5201 to
dc209f1
Compare
dc209f1 to
8102fca
Compare
8102fca to
fc487f8
Compare
…own softforks' warning
fc487f8 to
6718789
Compare
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
src/chainparams.cpp
Outdated
| consensus.DIP0003EnforcementHeight = 2; // DIP0003 activated immediately on devnet | ||
| consensus.DIP0003EnforcementHash = uint256(); | ||
| consensus.DIP0008Height = 2; // DIP0008 activated immediately on devnet | ||
| consensus.MinBIP9WarningHeight = consensus.DIP0008Height + consensus.nMinerConfirmationWindow; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why should this be dip0008? Also, should be this be bumped periodically / with each new hf hardening?
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
No description provided.