-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
merge #16117, #18358, #17383, #21052, #14424, #15159, #14689, #14978, partial #16908, #14978, #13932: Auxillary Backports #4229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Windows build borked |
d47fe88 to
f1ad65c
Compare
|
Rebased and updated EDIT: Pushed version without nanobench fix, re-pushed correct version |
|
Not compiling |
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
16908: missing changes in test/functional/mempool_persist.py
18358: see ebc239029c6e464c38cc1010755cfc387cef9a41
20788: lots of changes from other PRs
aacf67c to
408c9e8
Compare
|
functional tests borked |
da10617 to
9657ce4
Compare
|
Dunno what's happening with functional tests so bitcoin#16908 has been slimmed to the bare essentials needed for successive commits |
|
Needs rebase |
|
Tests are failing |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
|
Marking as WIP due to the fact this PR has stalled. Please rebase, and mark as ready for review when this PR is RfR |
|
Ready for review. Unrelated LLMQ tests failed |
|
Test failures in feature_llmq_data_recovery.py are persistent. Does not seem unrelated. |
EDIT: Integrated patches UdjinM6@781f6b9, UdjinM6@f37918a and UdjinM6@ada97ae by UdjinM6 have actually resolved the issue, thanks! 🙂 |
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need for extra `-txindex` in Dash-specific tests, it's `true` by default
…g a P2PKH input
…UI code; related refactoring
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Notes
bitcoin#20788 was originally having test failures and the lack of bitcoin#14624 was the cause. Tests run fine now.Scrapped from this PR