Skip to content

Auto-Scale Scheduler#64

Open
cicoyle wants to merge 3 commits into
dapr:mainfrom
cicoyle:feat-scheduler-auto-scaling
Open

Auto-Scale Scheduler#64
cicoyle wants to merge 3 commits into
dapr:mainfrom
cicoyle:feat-scheduler-auto-scaling

Conversation

@cicoyle

@cicoyle cicoyle commented Sep 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

auto scale scheduler proposal.

This design is based off a white boarding session done w/ @JoshVanL, thanks! 🚀

Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]>
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md Outdated
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md Outdated
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md

@artursouza artursouza left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good. I have 2 concerns:

  1. We should not be in the business of auto-scaling etcd, we should fix the first 1 or 3 scheduler instances to run with etcd. The problem is mostly with scaling down. Even going from 3 to 5 there is not a lot of value IMO.
  2. This proposal is getting into a great deal of detail that makes me wonder: if this is not a breaking change, can we do it in 1.16?

@cicoyle cicoyle mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2024
22 tasks
@JoshVanL

JoshVanL commented Oct 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1 binding

1 similar comment
@yaron2

yaron2 commented Oct 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+1 binding

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants