Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (04f7b59) 70.08% compared to head (c215be9) 70.08%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #492   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.08%   70.08%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        2841     2841           
=======================================
  Hits         1991     1991           
  Misses        738      738           
  Partials      112      112           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I'm all for adding validation flows to the sdk. Just not sure about committing relatively large binaries from the quickstarts to the repo.

Use a markdown file with little words is enough, we can comment it ( the file type and size we support etc.) in the doc

I'm all for adding validation flows to the sdk. Just not sure about committing relatively large binaries from the quickstarts to the repo.

which large binaries?

its just one main.go which would also help us to validate in our ci easily also I had the same thought which you commented . but if we have a look carefully there are many other examples directly taken from examples repo including pubsub (only few things are changed but overall its same) so I had to make a choice of consistency here

This needs to be added to the validation workflow to have any effect on CI.
I'll get a PR raised