This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 21, 2025. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
Fix Python 3.6 bug with re module flags - #153
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…rue (in Python 3, re module flags are RegexFlags instances, not integers)
astrofrog
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
As expected, Travis failed with only the regression test and is fixed with the second commit |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Python 3.6, re module flags are RegexFlags instances, not integers. This leads to an issue when setting e.g.
reflags=re.UNICODEwhich used to work in Python 2. This PR adds a regression test to illustrate the failure:And I'll push a fix once I confirm that Travis fails.