> > Additionally, I'm thinking if we move the TestViewMethods config variable outside of the AssertionTesting structure and put it in Testing. I'm thinking that testing view methods as a concept is more general than assertion testing or property testing. So maybe, we just push it up one level in the hierarchy. what do you think?

I understand this config to mean that assertion failures in constant methods will be treated as failure if assertion mode is enabled, but I see your point that this will affect the sequences generated for property mode as well. I suppose we could have CallViewMethods up one level and it enables assertion testing constant methods (if true) but also allows completely filtering out all view/pure methods (if false) in either mode.

We could capture this in an issue and decide this after merging and implementing filtering ( I want to replace #275 to be compatible with these changes and fix several bugs in its implementation)

Yeah I think this is fine for now and we can figure this out later

Originally posted by @anishnaik in #363 (comment)