Context
While working on #2398 I noticed that we are not validating if config provided has correct structure at all, in this pr i added basic validation for resolved configuration as doing unsafe type casting is really bad idea
Proposed implementation in not ideal, and requires more refining.
Proposal
Create new package responsible for validation of configuration and rules @commitlint/config-validator and use ajv to validate configurations loaded by @commitlint/load and @commitlint/resolve-extends
Validation should be done in 2 steps: config and rules
Config validation #2412
this should be first step of validation of config structure and type check properties, but it should not validate structure of specific rules as by default we should accept any configuration that matches
'string': [RuleConfigSeverity /* 0, 1, 2 */, RuleConfigCondition /* when */, unknown /* options */]
Rules validation
after resolving and merging all extended configs we should proceed to validate options for rules:
this is going to require change in structure of rule definition, we should add support for object and deprecate raw functions
in case if we don't have schema for rule, we should skip validation of options
Rule as object
schema property is optional, but recommended,
- if provided we should validate
options against it
- if not provided we should threat
options as any/unknown
{
schema: { ... },
handler (parsed, when = 'always', options) { } // I'm not sure about this name, but this can be refined/changed
}
Rule as function - backward compatibility
It should be threated as there is no schema provided and we should accept any options
function rule (parsed, when = 'always', options) {}
Why we should change default structure of rules
with moving away of simple function structure it gives us possibility:
this is my general idea for this, its not written in best way, but I'd like to hear your opinion on this
Context
While working on #2398 I noticed that we are not validating if config provided has correct structure at all, in this pr i added basic validation for resolved configuration as doing unsafe type casting is really bad idea
Proposed implementation in not ideal, and requires more refining.
Proposal
Create new package responsible for validation of configuration and rules
@commitlint/config-validatorand use ajv to validate configurations loaded by@commitlint/loadand@commitlint/resolve-extendsValidation should be done in 2 steps: config and rules
Config validation #2412
this should be first step of validation of config structure and type check properties, but it should not validate structure of specific rules as by default we should accept any configuration that matches
Rules validation
after resolving and merging all extended configs we should proceed to validate
optionsfor rules:this is going to require change in structure of rule definition, we should add support for object and deprecate raw functions
in case if we don't have schema for rule, we should skip validation of
optionsRule as object
schema property is optional, but recommended,
optionsagainst itoptionsas any/unknownRule as function - backward compatibility
It should be threated as there is no schema provided and we should accept any
optionsWhy we should change default structure of rules
with moving away of simple function structure it gives us possibility:
ability to expose json-schema for IDE to provide syntax autocompletionthis is my general idea for this, its not written in best way, but I'd like to hear your opinion on this