Skip to content

Conversation

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

Do a quick vendor test of c/image with a proposed PR for cherry picking into c/image v5.35.*.

Proposed PR: containers/image#2907

@mtrmac
Copy link
Contributor

mtrmac commented Aug 1, 2025

@TomSweeneyRedHat I’m not sure this adds much — the "Skopeo Test" tasks in containers/image#2907 already trigger a Skopeo test with an updated c/image.

The thing that I think we need to manage for branching is that the IMAGE_SUFFIX update from containers/image#2907 must be paired (both present, or both absent) with #2661 . I.e. now that c/image’s release-5.36 branch is created before the c/image update, it should point at a Skopeo branch before the Skopeo update — or the update needs to be backported to the c/image branch .

If the two are not in sync, Skopeo CI will always work (as long as Skopeo is internally consistent WRT the CI image and the integration test path) – but c/image CI will break (it will run on a c/image-owned image choice against a Skopeo-owned integration test content).

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member Author

@mtrmac got it, I think! I just cherry picked that change in c/image into the release-5.36 branch there. I'll vendor that into here.

Do a quick vendor test of c/image with a proposed PR for cherry picking
into c/image v5.35.*.

Proposed PR: containers/image#2907

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <[email protected]>
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member Author

@mtrmac I have vendored from containers/image@40d1027 this time. Fingers crossed!

@mtrmac
Copy link
Contributor

mtrmac commented Aug 2, 2025

@TomSweeneyRedHat this is a solid proof that containers/image#2913 doesn’t hurt, but it changes ~nothing in the Skopeo repo.

@mtrmac mtrmac closed this Aug 2, 2025
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 1, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants