[WIP / RFC] separate command-line to a separate module#50
Closed
thaJeztah wants to merge 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom
Closed
[WIP / RFC] separate command-line to a separate module#50thaJeztah wants to merge 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom
thaJeztah wants to merge 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom
Conversation
(This is a very quick attempt at "what this will look like") This repository provides both command-line utilities, and a module for external consumers. Currently, both are part of the same module; as a result, dependencies of both the module *and* the command-line utilities are listed in the repositories go.mod. This affects consumers of this project, because (due to go module's nature of dependency (version) resolution), those consumers will inherit all dependencies, or will be "forced" to use the same version of the CLI dependencies. This is a very quick attempt at separating the CLI utilities from the "module", by creating a separate go.mod (and module) for the CLI utilities. I'm not fond of the name (github.com/containerd/imgcrypt/cmd) for that module (possibly renaming to github.com/containerd/imgcrypt/cli would be slightly clearer). This change _will_ add some additional work when tagging releases; a separate tag should be created for the cli utilities (tagging as `cmd/vX.Y.Z`), and the "github.com/containerd/imgcrypt" dependency in the go.mod inside the cmd directory may need to be updated to reflect the latest version of the main module when tagging new releases (as the replace rule is non-transitional); something like: 1. update `github.com/containerd/imgcrypt` version in cmd/go.mod to "next release" 2. tag both `v<new release>` and `cmd/v<new version>` in tandem. CI / validation also needs to be updated to verify both `go.mod` and `go.sum` files are correct / up-to-date. Possibly checks should be added to make sure the main module is isolated from the cmd module (i.e., the "module" should not import any path from the cmd directory: the reverse is of course OK (and expected)). Finally; use of the 'vendor' directory may need to be discussed; it is common to only use a vendor directory for projects that produce binaries, but omit the vendor directory for "library" projects. In this case (if vendoring is still desired), the vendor directory should be removed from the root of the repository, and moved inside the `cmd` directory. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
Somewhat related to containerd/btrfs#34 (comment) (similar situation) @dims @stefanberger @estesp @mikebrow @AkihiroSuda wdyt? (mostly opening this for discussion / consideration: as mentioned, this would likely need some additional work) |
Contributor
|
I am not the expert on this but it looks good to me... |
Collaborator
|
I like this idea, I do think that this doesn't necessarily introduce much overhead with having a separate release for |
Member
|
I love to see this! |
Member
Author
|
ah, yes, keep forgetting about this one, and hadn't find the time yet to work on it (I'll try to find time, but if you (or someone else) wants to pick that up, please do!) |
Member
AkihiroSuda
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
[Carry #50] separate command-line to a separate module
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(This is a very quick attempt at "what this will look like")
This repository provides both command-line utilities, and a module for external
consumers.
Currently, both are part of the same module; as a result, dependencies of both
the module and the command-line utilities are listed in the repositories go.mod.
This affects consumers of this project, because (due to go module's nature of
dependency (version) resolution), those consumers will inherit all dependencies,
or will be "forced" to use the same version of the CLI dependencies.
This is a very quick attempt at separating the CLI utilities from the "module",
by creating a separate go.mod (and module) for the CLI utilities.
I'm not fond of the name (github.com/containerd/imgcrypt/cmd) for that module
(possibly renaming to github.com/containerd/imgcrypt/cli would be slightly
clearer).
This change will add some additional work when tagging releases; a separate tag
should be created for the cli utilities (tagging as
cmd/vX.Y.Z), and the"github.com/containerd/imgcrypt" dependency in the go.mod inside the cmd directory
may need to be updated to reflect the latest version of the main module when tagging
new releases (as the replace rule is non-transitional); something like:
github.com/containerd/imgcryptversion in cmd/go.mod to "next release"v<new release>andcmd/v<new version>in tandem.CI / validation also needs to be updated to verify both
go.modandgo.sumfiles are correct / up-to-date. Possibly checks should be added to make sure the
main module is isolated from the cmd module (i.e., the "module" should not import
any path from the cmd directory: the reverse is of course OK (and expected)).
Finally; use of the 'vendor' directory may need to be discussed; it is common
to only use a vendor directory for projects that produce binaries, but omit the
vendor directory for "library" projects. In this case (if vendoring is still
desired), the vendor directory should be removed from the root of the repository,
and moved inside the
cmddirectory.Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn [email protected]