CI: move Vagrant tests to GitHub Actions (larger runners)#8919
Merged
AkihiroSuda merged 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom Aug 7, 2023
Merged
CI: move Vagrant tests to GitHub Actions (larger runners)#8919AkihiroSuda merged 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom
AkihiroSuda merged 1 commit intocontainerd:mainfrom
Conversation
AkihiroSuda
added
kind/test
cherry-pick/1.6.x
cherry-pick/1.7.x
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
AkihiroSuda
force-pushed
the
vagrant-on-gha-larger
branch
11 times, most recently
from
73a8d43 to
0c3582e
Compare
AkihiroSuda
force-pushed
the
vagrant-on-gha-larger
branch
from
0c3582e to
d87111f
Compare
Member
|
fixes: #7109 |
We have been using Cirrus CI for running vagrant workloads as the standard runners of GHA lacks nested virtualization, but it looks like GHA with the "larger" runners support nested virtualization. Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
AkihiroSuda
force-pushed
the
vagrant-on-gha-larger
branch
from
d87111f to
2d3360e
Compare
cpuguy83
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2023
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
kzys
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This Vagrant on Mac job has been broken for a while. Instead this change moves Vagrant to larger Linux workers that provide nested virtualization. Our main branch did something similar (moving to Cirrus CI to larger GitHub-hosted runners) already as #8919. Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have been using Cirrus CI for running vagrant workloads as the standard runners of GHA lacks nested virtualization, but it looks like GHA with the "larger" runners support nested virtualization.