Skip to content

Conversation

@dcantah
Copy link
Member

@dcantah dcantah commented Feb 19, 2023

This updates the runtime/v2 README to state the experimental GRPC support for shims and how to choose the protocol.

This updates the runtime/v2 README to state the experimental GRPC support
for shims and how to choose the protocol.

Signed-off-by: Danny Canter <[email protected]>
@dcantah dcantah force-pushed the docs-rtime-grpc-shims branch from 6dd7822 to ea83632 Compare February 19, 2023 02:06
#### ttrpc

[ttrpc](https://github.com/containerd/ttrpc) is the only currently supported protocol for shims.
[ttrpc](https://github.com/containerd/ttrpc) is one of the supported protocols for shims.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: the phrasing here is a bit awkward

Suggested change
[ttrpc](https://github.com/containerd/ttrpc) is one of the supported protocols for shims.
[ttrpc](https://github.com/containerd/ttrpc) is the recommended protocols for shims.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@samuelkarp It seemed redundant to state it's recommended as there's a blurb at the bottom was my thought process 🤷‍♂️ Would you wanna change to this and get rid of the

It is recommended to use ttrpc in your shim but grpc support is currently an experimental feature.

Or I guess the bottom could be "As stated, it is recommended to use ttrpc in your shim but grpc support is currently an experimental feature."

@dmcgowan dmcgowan added this to the 1.7 milestone Feb 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants