Use cgroups.AddProc() for cgroups v1#5738
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Build succeeded.
|
|
Build succeeded.
|
|
Failure looks consistent across multiple jobs; Don't think that's related to my changes in containerd/cgroups, but this PR brings in some other changes, so perhaps that's related. |
|
opened #5740 to test just the cgroups update |
fd3c11d to
b44b9b3
Compare
|
Ah.. I'm stupid; I didn't copy the replace rule to the client/integration package, and that of course doesn't inherit the replace. |
|
Build succeeded.
|
c8a5bbd to
fd7470e
Compare
|
Build succeeded.
|
fd7470e to
d21b5bc
Compare
All occurrences only passed a PID, so we can use this utility to make the code more symmetrical with their cgroups v2 counterparts. Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
d21b5bc to
c091d48
Compare
|
Build succeeded.
|
|
Is this still supposed to be in draft or ready to review now @thaJeztah ? |
|
Ready now! Was waiting for CI to finish after I rebased 😅 |
|
@AkihiroSuda this LGTY? |
depends on
containerd/cgroups#200containerd/cgroups#202All occurrences only passed a PID, so we can use this utility to make the code more symmetrical with their cgroups v2 counterparts.