Skip to content

[release/1.2 backport] Correct import path and PusherFunc signature#3219

Merged
estesp merged 1 commit intocontainerd:release/1.2from
jcordasc:cherrypick-#3213-release-1.2
Apr 19, 2019
Merged

[release/1.2 backport] Correct import path and PusherFunc signature#3219
estesp merged 1 commit intocontainerd:release/1.2from
jcordasc:cherrypick-#3213-release-1.2

Conversation

@jcordasc
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backports #3213 to fix an import path (in services/server/server_solaris.go) and PusherFunc signature.

Signed-off-by: Jared Cordasco [email protected]

@estesp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

estesp commented Apr 18, 2019

EDIT: Please rebase on master to pick up the fix for AppVeyor CI

Sorry, you will need #3229 to be merged before we can get a clean run and you can rebase on release/1.2 HEAD after that.

Correct import path and PusherFunc signature

(cherry picked from commit 8722ec0)
Signed-off-by: Jared Cordasco <[email protected]>
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3219 into release/1.2 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           release/1.2    #3219   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        43.74%   43.74%           
============================================
  Files              101      101           
  Lines            10743    10743           
============================================
  Hits              4700     4700           
  Misses            5311     5311           
  Partials           732      732
Flag Coverage Δ
#linux 47.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#windows 40.85% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 56a6552...b9da989. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@estesp estesp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

nit: the commit is the merged one, not the original one. is it good?

@jcordasc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@fuweid -- For future reference then, the preference is to cherry-pick the commits from the branch rather than the merge?

@estesp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

estesp commented Apr 19, 2019

Yeah, usually we cherry-pick the actual author commit(s); that way you don't have a cherry-picked commit "authored" (in GitHub terms) by the merging maintainer. No problem.

@estesp estesp merged commit 6cdfa49 into containerd:release/1.2 Apr 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants