Skip to content

Update containerd dependencies for 1.2#2500

Merged
dmcgowan merged 1 commit intocontainerd:masterfrom
crosbymichael:12deps
Jul 26, 2018
Merged

Update containerd dependencies for 1.2#2500
dmcgowan merged 1 commit intocontainerd:masterfrom
crosbymichael:12deps

Conversation

@crosbymichael
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby [email protected]

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Jul 25, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2500 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2500   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.76%   44.76%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines        9555     9555           
=======================================
  Hits         4277     4277           
  Misses       4585     4585           
  Partials      693      693
Flag Coverage Δ
#linux 48.98% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#windows 41.04% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c09932f...5a0b040. Read the comment docs.

Comment thread vendor.conf Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mean to impose a process on you that we don't follow anywhere else, but since we are moving from tag to hash, do you think putting a comment that indicates something like # v1.0.1 +5 commits or something like that would be helpful?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a comment is desired perhaps the output of git describe would be appropriate? e.g.

$ git describe d810dbc60d8c5aeeb3d054bd1132fab2121968ce
v1.0.1-43-gd810dbc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

A nit comment but feel free to ignore

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@estesp estesp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; although I agree with @dmcgowan given runtime-spec is a known, versioned entity it could be helpful for those trying to guess what version of OCI spec we are vendoring.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dmcgowan dmcgowan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants