Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linux -> runtime/linux #2353

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 30, 2018
Merged

linux -> runtime/linux #2353

merged 3 commits into from
May 30, 2018

Conversation

ehazlett
Copy link
Member

This moves the linux package into runtime to be organized by the functionality it provides.

Refs: #2352

@ehazlett
Copy link
Member Author

I'm including the vendor updates here for tests. If the maintainers are OK with this package naming, I'll open a PR on containerd/cri to match.

@ehazlett ehazlett force-pushed the process-runtime branch 2 times, most recently from 291271e to 668d88b Compare May 23, 2018 13:20
@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

Ya, looks good. Ping @Random-Liu for a heads up on the CRI import changes .

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Member

I'll open a PR on containerd/cri to match.

The vendor.conf will need to point at your fork and the commit with the change to get CI passing. Once it is merged in CRI then another PR can be open to remove the use of the fork and update CRI. I usually point at a commit which is based on the version correctly in the vendor.conf to avoid pulling in additional unrelated changes.

@Random-Liu
Copy link
Member

@crosbymichael Will update containerd vendor for this.

@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

@Random-Liu I think @ehazlett will make the PR, I just wanted to give you a heads up with the change.

@Random-Liu
Copy link
Member

Random-Liu commented May 23, 2018

oops, missed that comment. Yeah, the naming change LGTM. :)

Feel free to send a PR to containerd/cri.

@ehazlett
Copy link
Member Author

@dmcgowan thanks!

@Random-Liu ya i'll do the vendor update. thanks!

@ehazlett ehazlett force-pushed the process-runtime branch 5 times, most recently from eff855c to 214ecf5 Compare May 29, 2018 14:42
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
// +build !windows
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this file got duplicated instead of moved

@ehazlett ehazlett force-pushed the process-runtime branch 2 times, most recently from e9cbee1 to 62da044 Compare May 29, 2018 17:12
@mlaventure
Copy link
Contributor

Seems there was a network error, I've restarted the job

@ehazlett ehazlett force-pushed the process-runtime branch 2 times, most recently from bcbac60 to 73fe7fd Compare May 30, 2018 12:57
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <[email protected]>
ehazlett added 2 commits May 30, 2018 09:23
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <[email protected]>
@mlaventure
Copy link
Contributor

The windows failure is probably not related, looks like a previous test may not have been cleaned up correctly. I'll restart the job to see

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2353 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2353   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    41.4%   41.4%           
======================================
  Files          66      66           
  Lines        7805    7805           
======================================
  Hits         3232    3232           
  Misses       4069    4069           
  Partials      504     504
Flag Coverage Δ
#windows 41.4% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 80bbaff...6653917. Read the comment docs.

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@dmcgowan dmcgowan merged commit 1e8b09c into containerd:master May 30, 2018
@ehazlett ehazlett deleted the process-runtime branch May 30, 2018 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants