release: prepare 1.0.2-rc.0#2074
Conversation
|
If there are critical issues missing from this proposed release, please pipe up! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe link to the revision or PR from/where which it was fixed since runc still doesn't have releases yet.
54337fc to
50c4983
Compare
|
@crosbymichael @mlaventure Make sure that language looks good to you. |
|
lgtm |
|
After merging a PR, it looks like we've had a flaky unit test: We are going to look at the impact of this failure on this release and work from there. |
|
This is new, i saw it once today so probably something merged in the last few days |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/1.0 #2074 +/- ##
============================================
Coverage 50.57% 50.57%
============================================
Files 81 81
Lines 7167 7167
============================================
Hits 3625 3625
Misses 2848 2848
Partials 694 694
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@crosbymichael I am pretty certain this is #2072. |
|
@crosbymichael @dmcgowan #2076 fixes this. It is not critical to backport, but it would be good to backport to ensure integration tests are clean. |
|
Ok, so #2076 works to fix this. It stabilizes the test content generation function and adds a lease to the content tests to ensure that content doesn't get garbage collected during the test run. I am recommending we backport it to maintain stable integration tests that don't have flaky tests like this. |
AkihiroSuda
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you mention the tar fix as well?
#2063
Makes sense to me; I've cherrypicked it into #2077 if others agree |
|
@stevvooe updated language lgtm. |
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <[email protected]>
50c4983 to
a67e9d2
Compare
|
@mlaventure @estesp @AkihiroSuda Updated. PTAL. |
|
LGTM |
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day [email protected]