ci: add build/test go1.26.0, drop go1.24#12844
Conversation
|
Related Documentation No published documentation to review for changes on this repository. |
|
Looks like CI settings need to be updated, because the
|
thaJeztah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
we probably want to backport this to the release branches, now that go1.24 reached end of the line.
add go1.26.0 into test matrix and remove go1.24 Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <[email protected]>
go 1.26 removes support for windows/arm (NOT windows/arm64) ref: https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.26#windows Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <[email protected]>
|
/cherry-pick release/2.2 release/2.1 release/1.7 |
|
@thaJeztah: new pull request created: #12917 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release/2.1 |
|
@akhilerm: #12844 failed to apply on top of branch "release/1.7": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@akhilerm: #12844 failed to apply on top of branch "release/2.1": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
While windows/arm pipelines are removed here, should windows/arm64 (64-bit) be added instead? |
|
Yeah probably should be added; I'd expected it to already be there, but looks like it's not (not sure why not though; I know arm(64) support on Windows was still somewhat in development, so perhaps because of that?) @apurv15 feel free to open a PR (at least for further discussion) |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.