Skip to content

client: clarify and rename WithRootFS#1249

Merged
stevvooe merged 2 commits intocontainerd:masterfrom
dmcgowan:client-rename-with-rootfs
Jul 25, 2017
Merged

client: clarify and rename WithRootFS#1249
stevvooe merged 2 commits intocontainerd:masterfrom
dmcgowan:client-rename-with-rootfs

Conversation

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updates the With* statements related to RootFS to clarify when a snapshot is created. Add WithRootFS to create a new task given mounts directly.

Closes #1244
Replaces #1212

@dmcgowan dmcgowan changed the title Clarify and rename WithRootFS client: clarify and rename WithRootFS Jul 25, 2017
dmcgowan added 2 commits July 25, 2017 15:24
Clarify terminology around functions which use and create
snapshots for containers.

Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <[email protected]>
Add WithRootFS for task creation

Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <[email protected]>
@dmcgowan dmcgowan force-pushed the client-rename-with-rootfs branch from 96ff86d to c7cc6ad Compare July 25, 2017 22:24
@stevvooe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1249 into master will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1249      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.37%   28.24%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines        2841     2854      +13     
==========================================
  Hits          806      806              
- Misses       1888     1901      +13     
  Partials      147      147
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
task.go 0% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
container.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
client.go 3.03% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9434bf9...c7cc6ad. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants