Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

downgrade go-difflib and go-spew to tagged releases #11220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2025

Conversation

thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

These dependencies were updated to "master" in some modules we depend on, but have no code-changes since their last release. Unfortunately, this also causes a ripple effect, forcing all users of the containerd module to also update these dependencies to an unrelease / un-tagged version.

Both these dependencies will unlikely do a new release in the near future, so exclude these versions so that we can downgrade to the current release.

For additional details, see this PR and links mentioned in it.

These dependencies were updated to "master" in some modules we depend on,
but have no code-changes since their last release. Unfortunately, this also
causes a ripple effect, forcing all users of the containerd module to also
update these dependencies to an unrelease / un-tagged version.

Both these dependencies will unlikely do a new release in the near future,
so exclude these versions so that we can downgrade to the current release.

For additional details, see [this PR][1] and links mentioned in it.

[1]: kubernetes-sigs/kustomize#5830 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
@thaJeztah thaJeztah added the cherry-pick/2.0.x Change to be cherry picked to release/2.0 branch label Jan 4, 2025
@thaJeztah thaJeztah self-assigned this Jan 4, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code labels Jan 4, 2025
@thaJeztah thaJeztah requested a review from dims January 4, 2025 02:00
Copy link
Member

@austinvazquez austinvazquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for the detail and context.

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

thanks for the detail and context.

Oh! You're welcome! It was definitely a bit of a "down the rabbit hole" case.

The TL;DR of this PR is that it may take some time for all of our (indirect) dependencies to be updates and remove the wrong versions. We don't control those, but at least with this PR we can cut the cycle, and help downstream users of containerd to start downgrading. Ultimately this should go away, but having this in place can help speed up the process, e.g. I found this when updating BuildKit and Moby to containerd v2, and those also depended on Nydus (and other snapshotters), which had to update because of containerd.

I may still have to end up doing similar PRs in BuildKit and Moby, but hopefully this helps speeding up cutting the cycle.

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into containerd:main with commit 3b15606 Jan 5, 2025
58 checks passed
@thaJeztah thaJeztah deleted the exclude_untagged branch January 5, 2025 15:50
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

/cherrypick release/2.0

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@thaJeztah: new pull request created: #11222

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/2.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@thaJeztah thaJeztah added cherry-picked/2.0.x PR commits are cherry picked into the release/2.0 branch and removed cherry-pick/2.0.x Change to be cherry picked to release/2.0 branch labels Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-picked/2.0.x PR commits are cherry picked into the release/2.0 branch dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants