Skip to content

Mark cuda-python 12.6.2 & 11.8.5 build 0 as broken - #1157

Merged
jakirkham merged 1 commit into
conda-forge:mainfrom
leofang:cuda-python-build-0
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

jakirkham merged 1 commit into
conda-forge:mainfrom
leofang:cuda-python-build-0

Conversation

@leofang

@leofang leofang commented Nov 11, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

xref: conda-forge/cuda-python-feedstock#95

We haven't concluded if we'd do another hot-fix release, or just rebuilding the package and bumping the build number is enough. But that discussion is irrelevant to the fact that the listed packages are broken.

cc: @conda-forge/cuda-python

Guidelines for marking packages as broken:

  • We prefer to patch the repo data (see here)
    instead of marking packages as broken. This alternative workflow makes environments more reproducible.
  • Packages with requirements/metadata that are too strict but otherwise work are
    not technically broken and should not be marked as such.
  • Packages with missing metadata can be marked as broken on a temporary basis
    but should be patched in the repo data and be marked unbroken later.
  • In some cases where the number of users of a package is small or it is used by
    the maintainers only, we can allow packages to be marked broken more liberally.
  • We (conda-forge/core) try to make a decision on these requests within 24 hours.

What will happen when a package is marked broken?

  • Our bots will add the broken label to the package. The main label will remain on the package and this is normal.
  • Our bots will rebuild our repodata patches to remove this package from the repodata.
  • In a few hours after the anaconda.org CDN picks up the new patches, you will no longer be able to install the package from the main channel.

Checklist:

  • I want to mark a package as broken (or not broken):

    • Added a description of the problem with the package in the PR description.
    • Pinged the team for the package for their input.
  • I want to archive a feedstock:

    • Pinged the team for that feedstock for their input.
    • Make sure you have opened an issue on the feedstock explaining why it was archived.
    • Linked that issue in this PR description.
    • Added links to any other relevant issues/PRs in the PR description.
  • I want to request (or revoke) access to an opt-in CI resource:

    • Pinged the relevant feedstock team(s)
    • Added a small description explaining why access is needed
  • I want to copy an artifact following CFEP-3:

    • Pinged the relevant feedstock team(s)
    • Added a reference to the original PR
    • Posted a link to the conda artifacts
    • Posted a link to the build logs
  • I want to add a package output to a feedstock:

    • Pinged the relevant feedstock team(s)
    • Added a small description of why the output is being added.

@leofang
leofang requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2024 02:20
@leofang leofang changed the title Mark 12.6.2 & 11.8.5 build 0 as broken Mark cuda-python 12.6.2 & 11.8.5 build 0 as broken Nov 11, 2024
@leofang

leofang commented Nov 13, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@conda-forge/core, this is ready

@jakirkham
jakirkham merged commit 6e22299 into conda-forge:main Nov 13, 2024
@jakirkham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks Leo! 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants