Skip to content

Conversation

@B1ueber2y
Copy link
Contributor

@B1ueber2y B1ueber2y requested review from ahojnnes and sarlinpe August 4, 2025 16:24
@ahojnnes
Copy link
Contributor

ahojnnes commented Aug 4, 2025

Thanks, I am a bit worried about numerical issues due to repeated multiplication of the relative scale factor. Could we alternatively find the average scale between optimized and original registered rigs?

@B1ueber2y
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, I am a bit worried about numerical issues due to repeated multiplication of the relative scale factor. Could we alternatively find the average scale between optimized and original registered rigs?

Done. This new approach will need access to the database cache to get the initial rig extrinsics.

Copy link
Contributor

@ahojnnes ahojnnes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, LGTM. In the future, we could potentially compute the scaling a bit more robustly but this is a good start.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

the rig translation is scaled up compared to configuration

2 participants