Add spase crosswalk #367

BaptisteCecconi · 2024-10-15T11:02:00Z

Following the presentation about CodeMeta by @dgarijo at the DASH meeting (heliophysics community) this morning, I prepared a first draft for a crosswalk between CodeMeta and SPASE (Space Physics Extract Search and Extract).

SPASE is an information model (a schema) to describe resources in heliophysics. SPASE resource types are Person, Instrument, Observatory, NumericalData, Repository, Software, etc.

The full schema is available here: https://spase-group.org/data/index.html

It is serialised as an XML schema (see here for the various versions).

An interactive web view of the Software class of the schema is available here.

I copy below the list of metadata element for the Software class in a flat view:

ResourceID
ResourceHeader
	ResourceName
	AlternateName
	DOI
	ReleaseDate
	RevisionHistory
		RevisionEvent
	ExpirationDate
	Description
	Acknowledgment
	PublicationInfo
		Title
		Authors
			Author
		PublicationDate
		PublishedBy
		LandingPageURL
	Funding
		Agency
		Project
		AwardNumber
	Contact
		PersonID
		Role
		StartDate
		StopDate
		Note
	InformationURL
		Name
		URL
		Description
		Language
	Association
		AssociationID
		AssociationType
		Note
	PriorID
AccessInformation
	RepositoryID
	Availability
	AccessRight
	AccessURL
		Name
		URL
		Style
		ProductKey
		Description
		Language
	Format
	Encoding
	AccessDirectoryTemplate
	AccessFilenameTemplate
	DataExtent
		Quantity
		Units
		Per
	Acknowledgment
SoftwareVersion
ApplicationInterface
CodeLanguage
Prerequisites
ExecutionEnvironment
	OperatingSystems
	Installer
		Availability
		AccessRight
		Acknowledgment
		URL
	Cores
	Storage
	Memory
InputProperty
	Name
	Description
	Caveats
	Units
	ValidMin
	ValidMax
OutputProperty
	Name
	Description
	Caveats
	Units
	ValidMin
	ValidMax

And here is an example of SPASE record for a Software:

https://hpde.io/CCMC/Software/Kamodo.html

crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

dgarijo · 2024-10-15T15:57:04Z

Thanks for your rapid response, @progval. @BaptisteCecconi asked me to review this, and I would like to make sure we are not missing other predicates. Please let me have a look this week and comment here. Thanks!!

rebeccaringuette · 2024-10-15T21:42:08Z

@dgarijo Thanks for taking a look at this, and thanks @BaptisteCecconi for working on this. One critical problem in SPASE is that external vocabularies are not supported, which is one of many reasons we cannot use SPASE as the metadata structure for the Heliophysics Software Search Interface. Perhaps the structure we design for that search interface will be what is used in SPASE 3.0 for software, but that remains to be seen. Because of those problems, I don't see much value in adding SPASE to CodeMeta's crosswalks, but it would be useful to see what other concepts are missing for software in SPASE. I expect to be in contact once we have our structure drafted in the coming months.

BaptisteCecconi · 2024-10-15T21:51:50Z

Hi @rebeccaringuette, I agree with your statements. The crosswalk I initiated should really be seen as a way to see what is missing on our side, as you say.

dgarijo · 2024-10-15T21:54:40Z

Hi Rebecca, I think it is still useful because with this mapping we can convert spase records into codemeta records (very useful eg when building a search engine ;) ). This is by no means attempting to replace spase. And as Baptiste points out, it may inspire future fields in the spase specification. El mar., 15 oct. 2024 11:42 p. m., Rebecca Ringuette < ***@***.***> escribió:

…

@dgarijo <https://github.com/dgarijo> Thanks for taking a look at this. One critical problem in SPASE is that external vocabularies are not supported, which is one of many reasons we cannot use SPASE as the metadata structure for the Heliophysics Software Search Interface. Perhaps the structure we design for that search interface will be what is used in SPASE 3.0 for software, but that remains to be seen. Because of those problems, I don't see much value in adding SPASE to CodeMeta's crosswalks, but it would be useful to see what other concepts are missing for software in SPASE. I expect to be in contact once we have our structure drafted in the coming months. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#367 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALTIGXLA3XGCG7LPMFZHJ3Z3WD4PAVCNFSM6AAAAABP64AQUCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIMJVGIYTOOBWGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

dgarijo

Hi @BaptisteCecconi can you please check my suggestions?
I completed them based on the information and definitions in https://spase-group.org/data/model/spase-2.6.1/index.html

crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

dgarijo · 2024-10-23T18:14:52Z

@BaptisteCecconi some of my suggestions are duplicated with comments in text, sorry. I started doing suggestions halfway through since you can commit them if you like them

dgarijo · 2024-10-23T18:16:39Z

@progval please have a quick look to see whether you approve with my suggestions whenever you have the chance. Sorry it took a bit longer than expected.

dgarijo · 2024-10-24T21:06:39Z

What about the other suggestions? El jue., 24 oct. 2024 11:05 p. m., Daniel Garijo ***@***.***> escribió:

…

Ok, feel free to ignore this then El jue., 24 oct. 2024 11:04 p. m., Baptiste Cecconi < ***@***.***> escribió: > ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. > ------------------------------ > > In crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv > <#367 (comment)>: > > > +isAccessibleForFree, > +isPartOf, > +hasPart, > +position, > +description,ResourceHeader/Description > +identifier,ResourceID > +name,ResourceHeader/ResourceName > +sameAs, > +url, > +relatedLink, > +givenName, > +familyName, > +email, > +affiliation, > +identifier,ResourceHeader/DOI > +name, > > not sure. I checked the other cross walks, and there are duplicate name > entries in the CSV (see, e.g., DataCite.csv). Line 47 is the resource name, > while line 56 is the creator name. That might be an issue, indeed. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#367 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALTIGUPOCSVWMVUCA2KAQDZ5FOGJAVCNFSM6AAAAABP64AQUCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDGOJTG4YDINRVGY> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]>

dgarijo · 2024-10-25T08:18:36Z

Thanks @BaptisteCecconi, if you have questions/comments on the remaining ones let me know

@dgarijo

Update after comments from @dgarijo

BaptisteCecconi · 2024-10-25T09:17:59Z

@dgarijo I updated all fields according to your comments. The only remaining issue may be the "funding" term, which could be mapped to 2 entities in SPASE (as you propose). I put a human readable process in the CSV (probably not a good thing for you :-)

dgarijo · 2024-10-25T09:31:52Z

Thanks!
Let's see what @progval thinks about that. Most likely we'll have to select one, not sure if otherwise it may break something in the validation scripts :)

dgarijo

I leave this to @progval to decide. I think the line funding,ResourceHeader/Funding/AwardNumber or ResourceHeader/Funding/Project (if no AwardNumber) will likely cause problems. It's a tricky one.

progval · 2024-10-25T14:58:41Z

In other crosswalks (SPDX, Leiningen, NodeJS, Cabal, CFF) we use / instead of or but it would be confusing here, so let's keep or and change the other crosswalks.

No need for the parenthesis at the end, IMO. Translations to Codemeta can have both values.

dgarijo · 2024-10-29T14:22:18Z

@progval if no further changes are required, can you merge this PR?

crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

dgarijo · 2024-12-04T14:57:50Z

@BaptisteCecconi ping so we can finalize this PR?

Co-authored-by: Val Lorentz <[email protected]>

BaptisteCecconi · 2024-12-06T09:09:23Z

This is good to go for me.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Val Lorentz <[email protected]>

BaptisteCecconi added 3 commits October 15, 2024 12:13

Create spase-v2.6.1.csv

ef4368f

Update spase-v2.6.1.csv

4b5f25b

Update spase-v2.6.1.csv

5acccaf

progval reviewed Oct 15, 2024

View reviewed changes

crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Remove mapping to processorRequirements

036a295

progval approved these changes Oct 15, 2024

View reviewed changes

dgarijo suggested changes Oct 23, 2024

View reviewed changes

BaptisteCecconi and others added 3 commits October 24, 2024 23:06

Update crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

0420218

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]>

Update crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

004602b

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]>

Update crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

c456a3c

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]>

Update spase-v2.6.1.csv

f7185fe

Update after comments from @dgarijo

dgarijo approved these changes Oct 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

progval reviewed Oct 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Update crosswalks/spase-v2.6.1.csv

7a25216

Co-authored-by: Val Lorentz <[email protected]>

progval merged commit 701d769 into codemeta:master Dec 6, 2024
2 checks passed

bact mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2025

Add more post-3.0 contributors to CONTRIBUTORS.MD #372

Merged

tmorrell pushed a commit to caltechlibrary/codemeta that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025

Add spase crosswalk (codemeta#367)

b8e6e79

Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Val Lorentz <[email protected]>

Add spase crosswalk #367

Add spase crosswalk #367

Uh oh!

Conversation

BaptisteCecconi commented Oct 15, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 15, 2024

Uh oh!

rebeccaringuette commented Oct 15, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

BaptisteCecconi commented Oct 15, 2024

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 15, 2024 via email

Uh oh!

dgarijo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 23, 2024

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 23, 2024

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 24, 2024 via email

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 25, 2024

Uh oh!

BaptisteCecconi commented Oct 25, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 25, 2024

Uh oh!

dgarijo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

progval commented Oct 25, 2024

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Oct 29, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dgarijo commented Dec 4, 2024

Uh oh!

BaptisteCecconi commented Dec 6, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

rebeccaringuette commented Oct 15, 2024 •

edited

Loading

BaptisteCecconi commented Oct 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading