I suggest the codemeta standard include the information on reviews and/or reviewers of software, such as reviews conducted at JOSS, rOpenSci, or Bioconductor

Possible subfields might include:

• The person(s) who reviewed the software
• The organization/journal/mechanism through which the review occurred
• The review itself (may or may not be publicly available via URL, or bundled with the software)
• The version that was reviewed

R packages can now include some of this information by including a 'reviewer' category as one of the person types in the "Authors" field in a DESCRIPTION file, e.g., https://github.com/ropensci/tidyhydat/blob/master/DESCRIPTION#L4-L11